How to stop them

Can You Get Rid of Intrusive Thoughts Forever? An Honest Answer

No, and the goal itself is the trap. What does change permanently is your response, and there is a specific reason the word "forever" keeps the thoughts loud.

5 min readBy Everyday Psychology

You have probably typed some version of this at night: how do I get rid of these thoughts, permanently, so they never come back. It is the most reasonable question in the world and it deserves a straight answer rather than a hedge.

No. Not permanently, and nobody can promise you otherwise.

But that answer is only half the story, and the other half is genuinely good news. The reason it is good news is that the word "forever" is doing something to you, and once you see what, a lot of the last few months makes more sense.

First, the terms. An intrusive thought is an unwelcome, involuntary thought, image or urge that arrives without permission and clashes with what you actually want. A compulsion is anything you do to make the distress it causes go away, including things nobody can see, like checking, reviewing or mentally reassuring yourself.

Why nobody gets a mind that never does this

In the largest cross-cultural study of its kind, researchers asked people across six continents what passed through their minds, and 94 percent reported at least one unwanted intrusive thought in the previous three months. Earlier work found the same thing in a harder way: when researchers set the intrusive thoughts of ordinary people with no diagnosis beside the obsessions of patients, the same themes ran through both lists, and what mainly differed was how often and how intensely the thoughts struck.

So the thought itself is not the abnormality, and its absence is not the destination. A brain that generates strange, dark and inappropriate material at random is a brain working normally. It generates thousands of thoughts a day and discards almost all of them without you ever noticing.

What separates a thought you forgot by lunchtime from a thought that has run your last six months is not the thought. It is what happened in the ten seconds afterwards.

The specific problem with "forever"

Here is where the word starts costing you something.

"Forever" is a request for certainty, and certainty about your own future mind is not a thing that exists for anyone. You cannot know today that you will never again have a disturbing thought, in the same way you cannot know you will never again have a bad dream.

So when you set "gone forever" as the target, three things follow, and all three make the thoughts louder.

You start monitoring. To know whether they are gone, you have to keep checking whether they are gone. That means keeping the thought in view, permanently, as the thing you are watching for. Daniel Wegner's research on thought suppression showed exactly this trap: trying not to think something requires part of your mind to scan for it, so the sentry you posted reports every sighting straight back to your attention.

Every arrival becomes a failure. With "forever" as the standard, a single intrusive thought on a Tuesday is not a normal event. It is evidence that you are back to square one. That interpretation adds a second wave of distress on top of the first, and the second wave is the one that makes a thought stick.

You never get to stop. A goal that cannot be reached cannot be finished, so the project runs indefinitely. People describe this as being tired in a way sleep does not fix, and they are usually right about the cause: they have been maintaining a permanent watch.

There is a name for the thing underneath all of this, and it is a treatable target rather than a personality trait: intolerance of uncertainty, the difficulty of leaving a question open. A 2023 meta-analysis found that treatments which target it reduce it, and that improvements in it track improvements in anxiety. Uncertainty tolerance is a skill, not a temperament.

What actually changes, and in what order

Something does change permanently, and it is worth being precise, because the order matters more than the speed.

The sting goes first. The thought arrives and the jolt is smaller. Same content, less voltage.

The urgency goes next. It stops feeling like something that has to be settled tonight before you can sleep.

The frequency goes last, and quietly. Most people cannot name the week it happened. They notice in retrospect that a thought which used to arrive hourly now turns up occasionally, and that they no longer keep count.

That order is why so many people give up at the wrong moment. They practise for three weeks, notice the thoughts are still just as frequent, and conclude nothing is working, when the first thing to change is exactly the thing that is hardest to measure from the inside.

The realistic destination is not silence. It is this: a familiar thought arrives, finds nothing to push against, and passes. You have not become someone who never has intrusive thoughts. You have become someone for whom they are not an event.

The move: one day off from checking

Since the monitoring is the trap, the first useful skill is a defined stretch of not monitoring. This works on its own and most people find it much harder than it sounds, which is the point.

The victory condition is not a quiet day. It is one day in which you did not run the assessment. Expect it to feel irresponsible, as though you are neglecting something important. That feeling is the alarm system objecting to a change of policy, and it fades faster than most people expect.

Do that repeatedly and something quietly strange happens, which people almost always report in the same words: a thought that has bullied them for months arrives, gets no reaction, and has less to say. Not gone. Quieter. That drop in volume is the entire mechanism of recovery, experienced first-hand rather than read about.

Why the reading has not been enough

You may have understood all of this already and still be stuck. That is not a failure of comprehension, and there is a reason for it.

Brains do not update from arguments. They update from experience. That is the core of modern research on exposure, notably the inhibitory learning work of Michelle Craske and colleagues: the fear does not fade because you were persuaded, it fades because you repeatedly did the thing and the predicted catastrophe did not arrive. Which is exactly why every reassuring article you have read, including this one, has never quite reached the fear.

The full path from here, in order, with the exercises and the pacing, is what how to stop intrusive thoughts opens up, and what the course does properly. But the day off from checking is yours now, and it is a real place to start.

If you want to know which kind of intrusive thoughts you are dealing with, the free two-minute self-check will name it. It is private and your answers stay in your browser.

Common questions

Can intrusive thoughts go away forever?

Not permanently, and no honest source will promise otherwise. Around 94 percent of people report intrusive thoughts, so a mind that never produces one is not on offer to anyone. What does change, and changes durably, is your response to them: with practice the thoughts lose their sting first, then their urgency, and only then their frequency, until they pass like ordinary mental noise.

Why does wanting them gone forever make them worse?

Because "forever" is a demand for certainty, and certainty about your own future mind is not available. Chasing it turns into a permanent monitoring project: you start checking whether they have gone, and checking is a compulsion. Every check tells your alarm system the thoughts still matter, which is precisely what keeps them arriving.

How long does it take for intrusive thoughts to get better?

There is no fixed timeline, and the order of change is more useful than the speed. Most people notice the sting fading within weeks of consistently not fighting the thoughts, the urgency going next, and the frequency dropping last and quietly. Progress is not linear, and stressful or sleepless periods turn the volume back up without erasing anything.

Do intrusive thoughts come back after treatment?

They arrive again, yes. What does not usually come back is the grip. People who have done the work describe the same experience: a familiar thought turns up, gets no reaction, and passes. Setbacks during stress, illness or poor sleep are expected and are not a sign that the work failed.

Is it bad to keep checking whether they have gone?

It is the most common way people stall. Monitoring your own progress is a compulsion wearing the clothes of diligence, and it keeps the thoughts on stage. The most useful version of progress-tracking is looking at your life rather than at your thoughts: what you did this week that you had been avoiding.

References

  1. Radomsky, A. S., Alcolado, G. M., Abramowitz, J. S., et al. (2014). Part 1. You can run but you can't hide: Intrusive thoughts on six continents. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders . doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2013.09.002
  2. Wegner, D. M. (1994). Ironic processes of mental control. Psychological Review . doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34
  3. Craske, M. G., Treanor, M., Conway, C. C., Zbozinek, T., & Vervliet, B. (2014). Maximizing exposure therapy: An inhibitory learning approach. Behaviour Research and Therapy . doi:10.1016/j.brat.2014.04.006
  4. Miller, M. L., & McGuire, J. F. (2023). Targeting intolerance of uncertainty in treatment: A meta-analysis of therapeutic effects, treatment moderators, and underlying mechanisms. Journal of Affective Disorders . doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.08.132